What is the plan for “Owner pay and affiliated-company costs”, with a focus on the signing process cannot know who is affiliated?

ADR-0009 (tentative): the owner may pay himself and his other companies from the cost base. Every cost line carries a related-party flag that cannot be omitted; such lines are shown separately and labelled, with an optional documented basis (otherwise it says no basis documented), and they sit inside the split, never on top. The calculation and the public view exist as code with MOCK data. The flag is only as honest as the person who sets it. Plan for: the signing process cannot know who is affiliated; the second signer may be related to a line; a lawyer should say if more disclosure is needed. It exists only as a file in the repository, not as a product feature.

Go to the related page

How to read this

The tag above says how real the answer is. Answers describe the plan in the repository and design documents. No app is released. Where an answer touches tax or law, treat it as a theme to verify with a qualified local adviser.

More in Offline-first architecture

• What should I plan for with “No margin on the fee”, thinking about no cushion for cost shocks?
• How risky is “Public and private donations” to get wrong, with a focus on tax and accounting treatment is open?
• Which edge cases come up around “Billing, notices and what a lapse stops”, especially around which services are charged is open?
• See it in context with the whole topic
• Search all answers